A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 30, 201, the Defendant, who forged a private document, uttering a falsified document, and the fraud, was in possession of the identity card in the name of four arms, a copy of a passbook, etc., which had been recorded in the cell phone in the “C” where the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, was working for the Defendant, with the intention to newly open a mobile phone in the name of D without authority.

Around October 30, 2011, the Defendant forged a private document and signed D's signature on the application form for a new entry of the mobile phone located at "C", stating D, resident registration number column E, "F 11 Dong Dong in Gyeonggi-do in the customer address column," the applicant/subscriber and buyer column, respectively, in the name of the subscriber.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the Defendant forged a copy of the application for membership in D, a private document on the exercise of rights.

B. The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document

At the time and place mentioned in the paragraph, as if the application form for forgery was a document duly formed, can be carried out using a gner, and then sent it to an employee under the name disapproval belonging to the LG U head office who is not aware of the fact.

C. Around that time, the Defendant sent the forged application form to an employee under the name of LG U, a victim, to deception, and was issued one cell phone terminal at the market price of KRW 275,000 from the victim.

2. On November 28, 2011, the forgery of private documents, the uttering of a falsified document, and the fraud accused obtained the identity card of G, a domestic female, from the Philippines, from which he/she had opened a mobile phone in “C”, through a LG U electronic computer system, and without authority to open a new mobile phone in G name.

The Defendant forged a private document by means of a written application for a new entry into a mobile phone kept therein at “C” around November 28, 201, and using the pen to “G” and “H” and the customer address in the resident registration number column.