The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, along with the victim B, was a person who worked in the joint office of administrative agency called “C” with the victim B.

For the purpose of slandering against the Defendant, “from January 9, 199 to 19”;

1. 10. 경까지 30명이 들어가 있는 'D구역주택재개발구역 카카오톡 그룹방 내에서 "베테랑들이 다 퇴사하고 초보들밖에 없습니다”, “요식행위로 어물쩡 넘기는것에 속으시면 안됩니다", "법무법인인 저희는 행정사따위와는 다릅니다", "성의없는 개판의 의견서", "자격없는 C을 문닫게 할것임을", "벌써 이바닥에 좁아서 평가사들 사이에 C 망했다는 소문이 퍼지기 시작했습니다"라는 허위사실의 글을 게시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.;

(b) A crime of failing to impose a penalty against an intention: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection,

C. On January 3, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, a written application for non-prosecution to punish the victim was submitted.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;