logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.04.28 2020고단531
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the victim B using the account “D” in C, and the defendant A uses the account “E”, “F”, and “G” on the same website.

On September 16, 2019, at around 20:58, the Defendant continuously posted a notice stating that “E” account is “E,” the victim’s account is named, and “malins women” in the Daegu Suwon-gu’s residence. On September 16, 2019, around September 21, 2019, the Defendant continuously posted a false notice stating that the victim was dead by continuously preparing the same writing as the attached list of crimes.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.;

(b) A crime of failing to impose a penalty against an intention: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection,

C. On December 12, 2019, after the prosecution of this case, a written application for non-prosecution of the victim was submitted.

arrow