A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 2365" is the head of a family.

On June 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a mutually cafeteria called “E” located in the Full-Time Seoul Special Metropolitan City D on June 17, 2016, the Victim C is entitled to buy and sell any auction goods at auction; and (b) at the interest rate of 10% per month for an investment.

“.....”

However, the Defendant was merely required to repay the bonds to a third party, but did not purchase the auction goods but did not repay or invest in the business after having purchased them, and even if receiving the money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to grant the profit or to repay the principal even if he received the money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim on the above false statement, was transferred to the post office account (F) in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

The defendant, from that time to that time,

7. Between 22. A total sum of KRW 67,750,00 in the indictment of KRW 68,250,000 in total from the injured party by the same method, such as the statement in the list of crimes attached hereto, is stated in the indictment of KRW 67,750,00, but considering the contents Nos. 7 of the list of crimes attached hereto, the Defendant received KRW 4,50,000,000 excluding KRW 5,000,000,000,000 in total, 67,750,000,000 in total from the bond company.

B Doese B and acquired it by fraud.

"2017 Highest 1317"

1. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant joined respectively at the house of the victim H of the 5-dong G apartment building 806 and 806, Simsan-si, Simsan-si, and received KRW 4.4,440,00 won calculated by subtracting KRW 660,000 for monthly payment from the monthly payment from KRW 10,000 on March 10, 2017 (6,000 for monthly payment) and KRW 4,460,000 for three (6,000 for monthly payment), respectively, on the same day.

However, in fact, the defendant is a large amount of money to the husband I and J at the time of this case.