beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Although the Defendant, who entered a building, sought to rent a store with the second floor of the building in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, the Defendant owned and managed by the victim B at low prices (hereinafter “instant store”). However, considering that it was not good between the victim and the victim and that he would not rent the store, the Defendant had the victim talk with the victim as if he would have leased the store. However, there were differences in terms of the terms of the lease, such as deposit and monthly rent, and the victim did not rent the instant store.
Nevertheless, around 08:00 on October 13, 2015, the Defendant instructed the above E to clean the inside of the instant store on October 17, 2015, at the manpower office located in the Dong-dong market near Suwon-si, 19, and ordered three side members, such as E, to enter all the articles located in the instant store as if the Defendant was the lessee of the instant store, and to enter outside the said store, at around 09:00 on the same day, he/she let the above side enter the instant store managed by the victim through a door that he/she was not locked, and continued to intrude into the instant store. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant instructed the above E to clean the inside of the instant store from the front side of the instant building, and let him/her enter the instant store without being locked and managed by the victim.
2. The Defendant: (a) ordered three persons, such as E, from the date, time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) above, to see that the Defendant was the lessee of the instant shop; and (b) ordered the said two persons, who are aware of the fact, to take out all the articles located in the instant store and the inner walls, etc.; (c) removed and make the inner walls, etc. inside the instant store from around 09:00 to 18:00 on the same day, and damaged the market price so that they would incur repair costs.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement 1.1.