logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.21 2014누60667
정보공개이행청구권
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. "Order of the court of first instance" in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following dismissal of some of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

Part of the revised part shall be referred to as "the fact that the date has not been designated" in Part 4 of paragraph 2 as "the fact that the date has not been designated".

Parts 2, 14, and 15 each part " March 7, 2014" shall be considered as " March 8, 2014."

2. As such, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit, and it is obvious that “ March 7, 2014” in the disposition of the first instance court is a clerical error in the “ March 8, 2014,” and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow