1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation as to this case are as follows. The plaintiffs’ new assertion in the trial are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment as stated in the following Paragraph 2, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 3rd, 8th, 7th, and 2th, of the judgment of the first instance court, "Plaintiff E" shall be "E".

Article 48 subparagraph 4 of the Infant Care Act (Article 48 subparagraph 4 of the Infant Care Act) shall be construed as “compliance with the standards for meal service management,” among the grounds for the disposition of Plaintiff B as stated in the fifth Schedule of the judgment of the court of first instance, and Article 48 subparagraph 4 of the Infant Care Act (Article 48 (1) 4 of the Infant Care Act) shall be deleted.

Part 6, Part 3 through 13, Part 7 through 14, Part 9, Part 10 through 15, Part 16 through 21, Part 14 through 21 of the decision of the first instance shall be deleted.

The 10th decision of the first instance court is the "actual ownership" of the 18th decision of the first instance.

In accordance with the purport of the testimony and the entire argument of the witness M of the first instance court, the actual fact that K and L had been registered in G childcare centers is not disputed between the parties.” The actual fact that K and L had been registered in G childcare centers can be recognized as the fact that H childcare had been taken care of the principal in the G childcare center even though K and L were registered in G childcare centers.

The Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs referred to in the 12th and 15th decisions of the first instance court as "the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs".

The 12th sentence of the first instance court's decision "2014" in the 15th sentence is "2014".

Part 6 of the 13th judgment of the first instance court refers to "AJ" as "AC".

The 14th written judgment of the first instance court is recognized as the 6th written judgment of the first instance court, and only the statement of evidence No. 5-1 and the testimony of witness M of the first instance court.