1. Of the parts concerning the primary claim of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff falls under the following order to revoke.

1. The cited part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is partially dismissed as follows (as stated in the second 4 to 6 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance), Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is in accordance with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

3 The following shall be added to "by shock" of the 5th parallel of conduct:

The Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") shall be amended into the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State.

Three and ten persons eligible for veteran's compensation shall be defined as the "Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran's Compensation" (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on Veterans' Compensation").

4 The 7th parallel " August 8, 2015" shall be applied to " September 1, 2015".

2. Article 2 of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance that is modified by this court

D. The written judgment of the court of first instance states "C. Determination," but this appears to be a clerical error in the judgment.

subsection (1) and (2) of this section.

D. 1) Determination of the relevant legal doctrine differs depending on whether a soldier or policeman wounded on duty or a soldier or policeman wounded on duty or a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, as prescribed by Article 4(1)6 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State, and a soldier or policeman wounded on duty or a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, as prescribed by Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State, is directly related to the protection of the people’s lives.

With respect to the causal relationship between the above performance of duties, etc. and the injury or disease, the claimant shall prove it, and it is not necessarily necessary to prove the causal relationship in medical or natural science, and considering all the circumstances.