Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a constructor, and around January 201, the victim E, the representative director of the D Co., Ltd., borrowed the name of the said corporation from the victim E, to receive a subcontract for Gtel civil engineering and ductal construction performed by “F”, and he stockpiled the relationship with the victim.

1. On January 201, the Defendant: (a) around the end of Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hbuilding 401, at the D Co., Ltd. office for the victim’s operation of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Building 401; (b) the victim was awarded a subcontract for construction works for the Hong-dong Office and Macheon-dong Office Office, Macheon Office, Sungcheon-dong Office, Sungsan-do Office, and Maungdo Breeding-do Breeding Office; (c) due to the intra-friendly branch office of a new bank, the contractor is bound to obtain a PF loan; (d) the contractor is obliged to grant a loan; (e) the construction work cost in the current Gtel site and the construction cost in the current Gtel site are required to be paid within three months, and (e) the victim would be awarded a subcontract for the civil engineering and framed works

However, among the construction sites in which the Defendant said that he was awarded a subcontract, there was only one actual receipt of construction in addition to the Gtel site, and the Defendant’s pro-Japanese was not the head of a bank, and the Defendant’s pro-Japanese was not the head of a bank. Since the Defendant’s failure to prepare an advance payment for the basic construction at the time of January 201, in the absence of financial capacity, such as carrying out the Gtel construction with cash borrowed from the victim, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the borrowed money within the time limit as agreed, or subcontract other field civil and structural construction works.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement as above and received KRW 20,000,000 from the victim to the new bank passbook in the name of the Defendant on February 1, 2011, and thereafter, from that time, up to July 20, 201 through the same seven times in total as shown in the annexed crime list 1.