beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2, 2012, the Defendant said that “A victim E purchased 7-800 square meters around the temple and newly built an officetel with a height of 24-5 stories at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name nearby G in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.” The Defendant said that “A new G may subcontract civil construction works for the construction of the instant officetel as the president in the Republic of Korea is entitled to enter into a subcontract for the construction of the said officetel, and that a subcontract is to be made if the said construction works cost is required, as the said construction cost requires KRW 20,000,000.”
However, the defendant was not the new president of G at the time, and even if he received 20,000,000 won from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to subcontract the new construction of officetels-related civil works.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 20,00,000 from the above G around January 29, 2013 from the injured party.
Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victim and received property from the victim.
2. On July 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s office located in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, the victim H said that “The Defendant would return KRW 20 million to the victim H within three months if he/she lends KRW 20,000,000 necessary funds for the reconstruction project of his/her J apartment.”
However, around July 5, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract on vicarious execution with L, the president of the said J apartment reconstruction project rearrangement cooperative, under the name of K, the Defendant registered as an auditor, with L, the president of the said J apartment reconstruction project rearrangement cooperative. However, around that time, the said J apartment reconstruction project rearrangement cooperative was unable to properly carry out the reconstruction project due to the nonperformance of the time selected, etc., and the Defendant provided the above contract on vicarious execution under the name of K.