Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 3,00,000, and Defendant Social Welfare Foundation C shall be fined of KRW 2,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct are the president of the G Care Center run by the victim’s social welfare foundation F in Scheon City E, and Defendant A are the employees of the G Care Center.

Defendant

A around September 9, 201, purchased clothes from Egypt in Sacheon-si, and settled 128,800 won with the victim's corporate card in the name of the victim, and Defendant B approved this.

The Defendants conspired in collusion and embezzled 16,321,50 won in total over 40 times from September 9, 201 to November 29, 2012 by using the following methods: (a) from around September 9, 2011 to November 29, 201; (b) as indicated in attached Table I, the Defendants embezzled 16,3

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant has been engaged in general management of the victim’s social welfare foundation C, the representative director of the victim’s social welfare foundation C and the president of the International Medical Center operated by the victim, such as care center fund management.

On November 9, 2011, the Defendant paid 432,00 won for golf costs to the victim who was in custody of the Defendant in the course of business.

The Defendant embezzled by using a total of KRW 6,769,950 in a total of 28 times from November 9, 2011 to June 24, 2013, as described in attached Table II, as the foregoing method, from November 201 to June 24, 2013.

(b) Where a social welfare foundation that has violated the Social Welfare Services Act intends to borrow a long-term loan with respect to its fundamental property for at least one year, it shall obtain permission from the Mayor/

Nevertheless, on January 18, 2010, the Defendant borrowed 250,000,000 won from K in the name of social welfare foundation C at the above International Medical Care Center Office, without obtaining permission from the Mayor/Do Governor.

3. The defendant C, a representative of the defendant, was the defendant A 2-B.

As stated in the paragraph, the defendant committed a violation regarding the defendant's duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of suspect regarding L by prosecution;

1. Written statement by prosecution;

1. Each police statement of the N,O, or P;

1.Each.