Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on July 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) checked the details of the report against the Defendant and F; (b) the police officers, etc. affiliated with the Mapo Police Station D District D, called “Wol Police Station, to report whether women are driving away” after receiving 112 reports; (c) reported that the Defendant’s male friendly G was found and F was arrested as a flagrant offender to the said police officers E, etc.; and (d) reported that the Defendant’s male friendly G was found and F was arrested as a flagrant offender, and that the Defendant’s f was arrested as a flagrant offender with the Defendant’s blood friendly G with drinking fright, and that he was assaulted once again, a police officer belonging to the Mapo Police Station H, who was a police officer belonging to the Mapo Police Station, who fested to the said police station that fing out the cell phone.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E, I and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act appears to have committed a contingent crime while under the influence of alcohol.

There is no history of criminal punishment before the instant case.