1. The remaining amount of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the expenses for auction from the proceeds of auction;

In addition to the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 2, it is acknowledged that the plaintiff shared 2/3 shares, the defendant shared 1/3 shares, and the plaintiff and the defendant did not hold an agreement on the division of co-ownership between the plaintiff and the defendant. Accordingly, it is reasonable to divide each real estate indicated in the annexed real estate indication into the auction and the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the auction price, by distributing each share of 2/3 and 1/3 to the plaintiff and the defendant.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and accepted.