1. The remaining amount of the real estate listed in the annex 1 list after it is put to an auction and the auction cost is deducted;

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff and the defendants are co-owners of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "real estate of this case") and their co-ownership shares are the corresponding ratio listed in the separate sheet No. 2 of the separate sheet No. 2 of the separate sheet No. 2 of the separate sheet No. 1, and

In addition to the above facts, the real estate in this case is not appropriate to divide it in kind as an aggregate building, it is reasonable to divide the remaining amount after deducting the auction expenses from the proceeds from the auction by means of the auction and then distributing it to the plaintiff and the defendants according to the relevant ratio stated in the attached Form 2 co-ownership sheet.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.