A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The debtor shall not submit a false asset list to the court.

Nevertheless, the Defendant submitted a list of the property to Sungwon District Court 2015, 50833, the Defendant was the obligor for the decision of specification of the property, and submitted the list of the property to Sungwon District Court 451, as of March 21, 2016, according to the Sungnam-si, Sungwon District Court 3,351,328, 1,000 won, which is the Defendant’s property, including 1 sheet, 80,000 won, including 1 sheet, 80,000 won, 40,000 won, and 1 set of cremation, 40,000 won, and 1 set of cremation.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted a false list of property to the court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A process deed;

1. Text of the Decision 50833, 197, 201, 201, 200,000,000

1. List of property and oaths;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a reply to property inquiry;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 68 (9) of the Civil Execution Act concerning the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is committed at the same time as an act obstructing the exercise of creditor's property right, and at the same time, as an act detrimental to the propriety of the court's compulsory execution affairs. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is focused on the case. The fact that the amount of non-reported property is a considerable amount of money, the defendant is old and primary offender, there is room for somewhat consideration in the circumstances leading to this case, as well as the fact that the compulsory execution procedures for some omitted property have been carried out, and the punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account all of the sentencing factors expressed in the trial process of this case, such