logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고정486
민사집행법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a lending broker, recruited loan holders on behalf of B (the remaining, 35 years old) who is a lending business entity from June 2010, and arranged loans between B and the lender.

1. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant, a creditor, appeared on the date for specification of property relations in accordance with the final and conclusive judgment of the lawsuit claiming return of unjust profits that he filed with the Defendant to the Seoul Southern District Court on April 7, 2015 (name 2384, 2015, name 2384).

In fact, the Defendant owned the movable property of the Defendant (Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 102, TV (mbab, approximately KRW 400,000,00) in the dwelling area of the Defendant, the two frackers (frackers, approximately KRW 600,00,000), the entrance air conditioner ( approximately KRW 400,000,000), computers and laundry machines, but submitted a false list of property by omitting the said movable property from the Seoul Western District Court No. 1001, Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government District Court on November 14 and 30, 2015.

2. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant appeared on the date for specification of property relations with the Western District Court on January 18, 2016, pursuant to the letter of adjudication (No. 2015Kao No. 3216) on which the Defendant Nonparty B requested that the complainant pay KRW 20 million to the complainant.

On January 18, 2016, the Defendant submitted a false list of property by omitting the said movables in the Seoul Western District Court No. 1001, Mapo-gu Seoul Western District Court No. 1001 on January 18, 2016, when he/she owned the movables of the Defendant (Seoul Mapo-gu C and 102 location), TV (marb, approximately KRW 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won) in his/her residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A list of property 2015 Kaz. 2384, 2015 Kaz. 3216 Kaz.

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records of movable properties;

1. Article 68 (9) of the Civil Execution Act and Article 68 of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime and the selection of punishment.

arrow