logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.04.09 2015고단82
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operated a game site without a trade name in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C underground.

From June 5, 2014 to June 9, 2014, the Defendant was a game product not rated by the Game Management Committee for the game in question, and was exchanged at KRW 100 per shop per game money after deducting 10 percent from the remaining game money in accordance with the result of the game, by installing 32 game machine for the game in which the winning is determined by an incidental method in accordance with the shape of the game, which was shown in the game.

After all, the defendant provided game products not rated by the Game Management Committee for use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of the game products for business, and made customers decide the acquisition and loss through an incidental method, and made them perform speculative acts by causing property profits or losses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police seizure records and each list of seizures;

1. The offender's domicile and control details;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 44 (1) 1, 28 subparagraph 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry Eligible for Punishment (the fact that a person has engaged in speculative acts using game products, choice of imprisonment), Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 1 (the fact that a person has provided game product not rated for use) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the fact that a person has provided game product not rated for use, choice of imprisonment), Article 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the fact that a person conducts

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Confiscation Industry Promotion Act;

arrow