1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. A. Of the real estate listed in the attached list, the second floor Adozine Housing 89.07 square meters is handed over, and B.

1. The following facts can be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5:

On July 21, 2005, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit amount of KRW 1 million, KRW 350,000,000,000,000,000 from among the real estate listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant house”) to the Defendant from July 20, 205 to July 20, 207, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 1 million, KRW 350,000,000,000 from July 21, 2005 to July 20, 207.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The Defendant leased and used the instant house in accordance with the instant lease agreement, and the Plaintiff did not pay a total of KRW 19.6 million [20 million x 3.5 million x 66 months x 3.5 million x 3.5 million x 3.5 million x 3.5 million x 3.5 million x 66 months ] until December 7, 2015.

C. On December 7, 2015, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendant that the instant lease agreement will be terminated on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the instant lease contract was terminated by termination on or around December 7, 2015, the Defendant, a lessee, is obligated to transfer the instant house to the Plaintiff, a lessor, and the Plaintiff, a lessor, and to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 18.6 million (19 million, delayed rent 19.6 million) and KRW 18.6 million (1 million, delayed rent 19.6 million) and KRW 3.5 million from January 21, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the instant house, as requested by the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.