All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Determination as to the allegation of unfair sentencing by both parties

A. The Defendant asserts that the sentence of the lower court is too too unreasonable, and the Prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the lower court is too unfilled and thus unfair.

B. In full view of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant produced obscene materials using the victim and threatened the victim again, and that the victim wants to punish the defendant, etc., and that the defendant reflects the defendant's criminal act, and that there is no record of the same kind of crime, the sentencing of the court below is determined within the reasonable scope of discretion, and thus, it cannot be said that the sentencing of the court below is too weak or unreasonable because it was made within the reasonable scope of discretion.

We do not accept the argument of the defendant and the prosecutor that the court below's sentencing is unfair.

2. In full view of various circumstances revealed by the lower court, such as the fact that there is no history of sexual assault against the Defendant to determine whether to exempt the disclosure or notification of personal information, there is a special reason that the disclosure or notification of personal information of the Defendant should not be made.

The decision is judged.

It is justifiable that the court below exempted the defendant from issuing an order to disclose and notify personal information.

This part of the Prosecutor's argument is not accepted.

3. Conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is dismissed as all are without merit.