The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment on the prosecutor’s unfair assertion of sentencing, and the lower court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). This court did not submit new materials for sentencing, and there is no particular change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the facts that the Defendant had no record of criminal punishment, and the type of indecent act used in the crime is not serious, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and pleadings, the Defendant exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by excessively unhueding the Defendant’s punishment and exceeding the reasonable scope.

shall not be deemed to exist.

We do not accept the prosecutor's argument that the sentencing of the court below is unfair.

2. In full view of various circumstances revealed by the lower court, such as the fact that there is no record of sexual assault against the Defendant in determining unjust grounds for exemption from disclosure or notification of personal information, there are special circumstances that should not disclose or notify the personal information of the Defendant.

The decision is judged.

It is justifiable that the court below exempted the defendant from issuing an order to disclose and notify personal information.

This part of the Prosecutor's argument is not accepted.

3. The appeal by the conclusion prosecutor is dismissed for reasons.