logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.12.14 2015가합24434
보관금 등 반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 108,681,474 as well as 5% per annum from August 27, 2015 to December 14, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 2005, the Plaintiff: (a) around the Defendant’s name, as indicated below, announced the Defendant’s bid combining G public parking lots (52 parking spaces) and I public parking lots (38 parking spaces) in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, with the Defendant’s name; (b) “E public parking lots” located in F, F, and 15 lots; and (c) the Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu Seoul, Seoul, publicly parking lots (52 parking spaces) and I public parking lots (38 parking spaces) and entered into an entrustment management contract en bloc.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant parking lots” was awarded a successful bid for each of the above parking lots and completed business registration, and entered into an entrustment management contract with the Songpa-gu Office, and made the Defendant take charge of the management of the parking lot, and agreed to pay approximately KRW 2.5 million monthly salary to the Defendant.

The term "the first year" and "the second year" in 2005 and the first year in 2006, "the second and second years" in 2006 and the first year in 2007, "the second and second years" in 2007 and the second and second years in 2008.

3) On June 30, 2005, from July 2005 to June 30, 2006, the aggregate of the consignment money in the name of the parking lot on July 30, 2005 to June 30, 2006, E 170,100,190,000 G 155,090,000 on June 23, 2005 to June 2006 from June 23, 2006 to June 182, 2006 to June 186, 200, E 37,46,000,56,0037,56,000 on June 5, 200, from June 15, 2006 to June 30, 2006 to June 30, 2008 to June 36, 2007

B. While managing and operating each of the instant parking lots, the Defendant collected parking lot usage fees in cash, and deposited money from the revenue of the parking lot at any time after deducting expenses, such as costs of maintenance, gas, electricity, electricity, optical heat, and employees' meeting expenses, into the Plaintiff’s account in the name of the Plaintiff. The sum totaled as a result of the tax investigation with respect to the Plaintiff is as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as "the Plaintiff's name account" for each of the above tables. In general, the first, second and second accounts in the name of the Plaintiff, the second accounts in the name of the Plaintiff in the second year, and the third, fourth and third accounts in the name of the Plaintiff in the name of the Plaintiff in the third, fourth and third years in the name of the Plaintiff in the third and sixth accounts in the name of the Plaintiff

arrow