Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s operation of each of the instant parking lots 1) around June 2005, the Plaintiff had the Defendant as indicated below, on the Defendant’s name, “E Public Parking Lot” located outside of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and “G Public Parking Lot” located outside 15 lots, and “I Public Parking Lot” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant parking lots”).
(2) The Plaintiff agreed to pay approximately KRW 2,50,000 per month to the Defendant while operating each of the instant parking lots after obtaining a successful bid for the operation right and concluding the consignment management contract with Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant parking lots”) (hereinafter “three years”). During the period of operation of each of the instant parking lots, the period of February 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006 and February 2006 and 1, 2007 for the taxable period of value-added tax shall be deemed “two years,” and the two years and 1, 2007 and 208 shall be deemed “three years,” respectively.
(2) On July 30, 2005, the 170,100,00, 325,190,000 G and I 15,000 on June 23, 2005 and the 155,090,000 G and I 150,00 on June 23, 2006 to June 2007 (2), the 30G 182,46,000, 37,556,000,000, or the 20G 207, 307, 2007, respectively, the 207G 196, 207, 307, 207, 207, 30G parking lots.
B. One Defendant in the deposit account related to the operation of each of the instant parking lots shall pay the parking fee while operating each of the instant parking lots.