Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for five months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Interference with business affairs, the Defendant attempted to withdraw money through an automatic cash payment device at the convenience point of “E” to work as the victim D ( South, 25 years old) working for the victim D (E) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-do, on May 9, 2016.

The defendant, who did not withdraw due to shortage of balance, borrowed KRW 10,00 to the victim.

When the defendant was refused from the victim, the defendant assaulted the victim, such as blicking the victim twice, intending to blick the victim's eye with fingers, and interfered with the victim's convenience store management by force above.

B. When the victim D reports to the police as the day referred to in paragraph 1 and voluntarily accompany the victim to the crime of assault, the Defendant who interfered with his duties became a victim of the crime of assault.

On May 9, 2016, the Defendant, at around 18:30 again, purchased a part of the goods at the convenience store under Paragraph 1 and repeated the Defendant’s act of demanding return of the goods and requesting return of the goods to cancel the settlement.

The defendant, who is unable to put the victim into large interest, has expressed a desire to do so, and "D's wum."

The victim interfered with the victim's convenience store management by force over about one hour, such as threatening "."

2. On June 28, 2016, the Defendants were required to engage in the joint crime by the Defendants in the “H restaurant” operated by the victim G (n, 63 years of age) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, to drink together with the “H restaurant” operated by the victim G (n, 63 years of age).

The Defendants were unable to take a bath to customers who are in a restaurant, and were unable to enter the restaurant, so they were unable to frighten the disturbance.

At that time, the police officer called the restaurant with the victim's report, and the defendant A sent his sexual flag to the restaurant floor.

Defendant

B, while taking a bath to a police officer who was dispatched, the spits spits on the floor that the spits or spits the spits on the floor may be removed from the police officer to the spits or spits the horses that the police officer would request to leave the spits.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance due to its actions, etc.

In this respect.