beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 600,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 1, 2011 to August 19, 2015 and the following.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. In Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu D, E, F, G, H, and I land (hereinafter “instant land”) were owned by the Plaintiff, and on the above ground, the Craar shooting range (hereinafter “instant shooting range”) was established from September 1, 1971 to November 2008.
B. The carbon (Pb) ingredients were included in the carbon refund used in the instant shooting range. Accordingly, soil contamination caused by water supply in the vicinity of the instant shooting range was generated.
C. On October 19, 2005, the head of Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City issued an order to improve the soil contamination level of the site of this case to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration affiliated with the Plaintiff, who is the managing authority of the site of this case, on the ground that the price exceeded the soil contamination level and the potential level.
(hereinafter “instant purification order”). D.
According to the instant purification order, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with JJ Co., Ltd., the Korea Resources Corporation and the Korea Resources Corporation for the instant site soil contamination purification project. From January 4, 2010 to March 31, 2013, J Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff performed soil purification services, such as excavation of contaminated soil, soil purification, soil reclamation, reclamation of soil, waste disposal, etc., and the Korea Resources Corporation performed soil purification services, such as soil and underground water contamination survey, guidance and supervision of soil purification projects, and verification of soil purification completion. At its cost, the Plaintiff paid KRW 830,00,000,000 until December 31, 2010, KRW 3,178,45,000 until May 25, 2012, KRW 247,005,000,000,500,500,000,000 won until March 31, 2013.
E. Meanwhile, the shooting range of this case was completed around September 1971 and thereafter from the time of completion to the middle of December 1979, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant from the middle of December 1979 to December 22, 2002, and the Defendant from December 23, 2002 to September 30, 207, and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor again operated the shooting range from October 1, 2007 to November 27, 2008.