Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

on the part of the defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who installs 78 game units for "E" and Defendant B is an employee of the above game room. A is a business owner who operates the game room with "E" and the employee of the above game room. The defendant is an employee of the above game room.

From January 23, 2015 to February 23, 2015, the Defendants exchanged 10,000 won per 500 points earned according to the scam in cash by many unspecified customers who found the above game room.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the type of results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. Police seizure records;

1. A permit for a general game providing business entity, on-site photographs, and a description of game products;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The crime of this case committed by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act is highly likely to cause property losses by continuously taking advantage of the users’ speculative spirit, and thus, the risk of leaving economic distress in the light of the light of the society is extremely large; the Defendants did not oppose the denial of the crime; and Defendant A’s participation in the game room is a factor for sentencing disadvantageous to the Defendants.

The fact that the Defendants have no criminal history of the same kind is an element of sentencing favorable to the Defendants.

In addition, taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the size of the game site, the age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, it is ordered as ordered.