logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.04.07 2016고단65
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a car in the color of the No. B.S.

On November 1, 2015, the Defendant passed through the third tunnel of the Tong-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-west at the upstream of the road, and proceeds at a speed of 100 kilometers per hour in the direction of the Si-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri along the two tunnels, depending on the one lane from the 2nd tunnel of the Tong-young.

At this time, the Defendant: (a) expressed his intention to yield the course of one lane while driving the victim C (n, 27 years of age) with a low-speed car; (b) obstructed the running and overtaking of the horn by the intention of the victim C (n, 27 years of age); (c) obstructed the running and overtaking of the low-speed string, which the female drives, and (d) taken a fright at the intervals of the fright.

Therefore, the Defendant, while driving the above sprink, which is a dangerous object, was driven in front of the injured party's low speed, and without any justifiable reason, sprinked as being likely to cause a sudden accident by taking a sudden brack, and the female changed the course to a two-lane, such as the defect in order to change the course into the two-lanes of the damage, thereby blocking the front, blocking the bracking, taking the brack, and preventing the victim from changing the course from the two-lane to the one-lane, again, in order to avoid the damage again, by changing the course from the two-lane to the two-lane.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim who was driving a vehicle on an expressway with the above SP car, which is a dangerous object, to prevent the victim from driving the vehicle on the expressway from driving the vehicle normally, changing course and overtaking the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (attached to the video and photographs damaged by a retaliationed driver);

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. At the time of committing the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the crime of this case is not good in light of the speed of driving on the expressway of the Defendant and the victim, the change of the vehicle vehicle, and the attitude of rapid stop.

arrow