logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.03.25 2014고정390
산업안전보건법위반
Text

The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the site site of Defendant B, who performs the F construction works in E in Busan Metropolitan City, and is responsible for the safety and health management of his employees. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of construction business and is responsible for the construction ratio of 30% as the contractor of the joint contract of the construction work. Defendant C is a corporation established for the same purpose and is responsible for the construction ratio of 49.9% as the contractor of the joint contract of the construction work.

1. Defendant A

A. In the event that it is difficult for a business owner to install a safety watch at a place where workers might fall or fall down, he/she shall install a safety watch, and in cases where it is difficult to install a safety watch net, he/she shall take necessary measures to prevent the fall risk, such as having workers wear a safety watch, etc., but the Defendant, while conducting the work for repairing and reinforcement of the safety watch at the construction site of the aforementioned construction site on March 4, 2013, he/she had two workers work without installing a safety watch net at a height of five meters above the ground without installing a safety watch.

B. In order to prevent the danger of electric shock, the business owner must contact the metal boxes, etc. of electricity, machinery, and apparatus to prevent the danger of electric shock, but on March 4, 2013, the Defendant did not contact the instant construction site with the outside of the iron bars of the stage upper part of the performance hall at the construction site.

C. Although a business owner should not dismantle or stop the use of protective devices installed in a machine, apparatus, or equipment, the Defendant removed the mobile diverse hacker’s protective covers at the construction site on March 4, 2014.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. and Defendant C Co., Ltd. did not perform safety measures regarding the Defendants’ duties as described in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1.

arrow