logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.01.09 2018고단1732
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants of the 2018 Highest 1732 carried out the new construction and sale business of the Manan-gu Manan-gu C lending around 2014, and Defendant B, the management role of bank loans and sales funds, and Defendant A, the role of concluding the sales contract with the buyer.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendants stated that “When transferring the sale price, the Defendants would transfer the ownership after cancelling the registration of the real estate security trust as set forth in subparagraph C E” to the victim D.

However, in fact, the Defendants had already paid the sales price received from the buyers in return to the land price and construction cost in another construction site as well as the construction cost, etc., while carrying out the construction of a new loan, such as the Gyeyang-do at the Incheon and the construction site, and all the Defendants did not have any specific property in bad credit. Therefore, even if they received the sales price from the victims, they thought that they would be used to repay necessary funds and personal obligations at another construction site, and there was no intention or ability to transfer ownership to the victims after cancelling the registration of the real estate security trust as provided in subparagraph c E.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, as seen above, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, concluded a sales contract on January 10, 2015 with the victim, and received five million won from the victim as the sales price for the same day from that time.

9. By August 9, 200, a total amount of KRW 132,613,00 was transferred to an account (G Bank H) in the name of Defendant B’s wife as the sale price, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim's property by deceiving the victim.

Defendant B- The Defendant, around July 16, 2017, has the J who deals with the sales agency business of the I building in the I building at the office of sales of the I building at the time of Pakistan on July 16, 2017, to the Victim K and L.

arrow