1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

1. The occurrence of the instant accident

A. The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 11 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole purport of the pleadings:

1) The Plaintiff’s vehicle C around February 19, 2018 (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 15:35:

(2) At the time of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the two-lane road in front of the Escopic parking lot in Chuncheon City D was driven along two-lanes by the Corporation’s scopic distance slope from the scopic distance slope, waiting to stop and turn off the vehicle according to the scopic red signal. (2) At the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped in front of the left side of the two-lane and as a result, there was a space for motor vehicles to pass through between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and India.

3) The Defendant’s vehicle F (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”)

4) While driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle tried to pass the intersection by using a space above the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which stopped for signalling in front of the Defendant vehicle, along the two-lanes. (4) The front part of the Defendant’s vehicle was changed to a straight line signal to the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and accordingly, the signal was changed to the straight line. Accordingly, while the Plaintiff’s vehicle starts from the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was earlier than the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was shocked with the penter.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant vehicle stopped through the right side of the plaintiff vehicle that passed through the deadline for reporting. However, according to the video and the overall purport of the arguments, Gap evidence Nos. 10, Eul evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 11, the following circumstances, i.e., it is pluck up or pl up to the right side of the plaintiff vehicle immediately after the occurrence of the accident in this case, while the defendant vehicle is on the left side of the defendant vehicle.