The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, as a reserve force member, failed to undergo the second supplementary training for eight hours on March 22, 2017, without justifiable grounds.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are premised on the lawful delivery of a notice of call-up. There is no evidence to prove that a notice of call-up to the Defendant regarding training as stated in the facts charged was lawfully given.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, the court rendered a judgment of innocence pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and did not disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence to the defendant pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal