The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 29, 2017, the Defendant filed a complaint against the victim’s wife F on the ground that the victim, who was the victim’s body fighting with the victim, submitted a medical certificate to the police station before the victim’s convenience store in the operation of the victim D (E) located in Tonsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on April 17, 2017, on the ground that the victim, who was the victim, submitted the medical certificate to the police station.

D It is difficult to work from this floor.

The husband of the family in the early sea would not have the father D and the family of the party.

“To the effect that it was “,” the victim threatened the victim by having the victim deliver the intent of the threat of harm to the victim through the F.

2. The conclusion of the judgment is that a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on July 11, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.