beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, as a deaf-mute, did not have any particular property or income, was carried out as a father in his house and as a stock expert.
1. Around February 21, 2007, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C’s home at Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 108 Dong 1006, stating that “The victim will make a large amount of interest on the need for money. It will use and return it only for 1-2 months and for 1-2 months.”
However, at the time of the repair and maintenance day, the defendant was only punished by 1.5 million won in monthly wage while the repair and maintenance day, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim because there was no particular property or income other than the above revenue, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received the cash card in the NongHyup Bank account under the name of friendly E, the victim used by the victim, and received the cash card from the victim, and the victim, alone, did not withdraw or remit money with a cash card, and the Defendant, alone as the Do governor, wired money from the victim to the account in which the victim withdrawss money or used by the defendant. The Defendant, from the above E’s above account with the card, withdrawn money of KRW 10 million from the above account or remitted money from February 11, 2009 to the account used by the defendant. From February 11, 2009, the Defendant received the cash card used by the victim 14 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes.
2. Around July 1, 2008, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the home of the victim F, the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 108 Dong 1006, the victim, who is the deaf, “it is necessary to pay money to make stock investments, will use only one year, return it to 20 million won, and his father may fully repay it to his father.”
However, at the time, the defendant was in the monthly salary when he maintained the next repair.