1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows: “Basic Administrative Regulation Act” of Part 8 of the first instance judgment No. 3 is deemed to be “Framework Act on Administrative Regulation”; “not later than the final and conclusive date” of Part 8; “No. 5” (hereinafter “the judgment of the final appeal in this case”) “B” (hereinafter “the judgment of the final appeal in this case”); “No. 6 pages 3 through 4”; “B” of the judgment of the final and conclusive date on March 8, 2015, the fact that the court passed the written examination of information processing engineer among national technical qualifications on March 8, 2015; “No. 2” of the final and conclusive examination on October 4, 2015; “No. 6,7” of the first instance judgment; “No. 2 of the final and conclusive judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to the Plaintiff’s final and conclusive examination on the admission qualifications of the first instance court; and the Defendant shall also revoke the Plaintiff’s decision of the first instance court’s final and fourth of the final judgment.

'For reasons, 'the instant disposition' is called 'the reasons for the instant disposition'.

The instant pass disposition was revoked.

hereinafter referred to as "the cancellation of this case"

3. The disposition of revocation in this case is unlawful against Articles 21 and 22 of the Administrative Procedures Act, since the defendant notified the plaintiff prior to the disposition of revocation in this case or did not give an opportunity to present opinions.

8 The defendant aims at balancing between public and private interests prior to the issuance of the disposition of cancellation of this case.