beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from August 28, 2013 to May 4, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the party 1) B (Security Guards), C (Assistants) and D (The Inspector and Team leader) are only referred to as the “Estation” (hereinafter referred to as the “Estation”).
(2) On August 28, 2013, as a police officer belonging to the police station, the Plaintiff voluntarily operated the Plaintiff by a police box and investigated the Plaintiff’s theft suspicion. (2) The Plaintiff (the Plaintiff) was a disabled person of Grade II intellectual disability and was in the third grade of high school at the time of the investigation.
B. At around August 2013, the police officer of the police box received reports on larceny damage several times from the residents of the F apartment 206 Dong-dong, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The police officer of the police box sent a report to the vehicle on August 28, 2013 that he/she wanted to take a room at the above apartment building 206 Dong-dong, and sent the report to the scene to the scene, and voluntarily carried it to the E box. 2) The police officer of the police box (B, D) visited the Plaintiff’s house at around 01:40 on the same day and voluntarily operated the Plaintiff to the E box.
At that time, the plaintiff's reference H and G's reference I was accompanied.
C. 1) The police officer of the E box (C) examined the Plaintiff and G from the date immediately after the Plaintiff voluntarily acted (on August 28, 2013, around 01:40). At first, the Plaintiff and G were allowed to sit in the Plaintiff and G with H and I, which were the subsidiaries of the Plaintiff and G, but at around 04:00 on the same day, the police officer waiting for the E box outside of the police box on the ground that it interfered with the investigation. 2) The police officer of the investigation (B, C), around 04:00 on the same day, was going in the Plaintiff and G while going in the course of the investigation and the theft site investigation and the theft-related goods, and divided them into the parts of the Plaintiff and G’s hand, and B, within the patrol vehicle, brought the Plaintiff and G to the Plaintiff and G, “I see that I will see this son.”
3) The above police officers (B, C, at around 07:00 on the same day after completing the on-site investigation, returned to the Plaintiff and G for their meals, but on the same day.