(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.05.12 2014노2641

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.05.12 2014노2641

사문서위조등

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding or misunderstanding of legal principles) agreed with the victim to transfer the apartment house in the name of the victim to F in order to be registered as a recipient of basic livelihood security from March 2013 to F, the actual owner of the apartment house. On May 2013, 2013, the Defendant obtained a driver's license necessary for the transfer of ownership directly from the victim and prepared a power of proxy for the certificate of seal impression in the name of the victim. Thus, the Defendant's act by consent of the victim does not constitute a crime.

2. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. The Defendant who forged a private document is the victim C and the legal couple, and is currently pending a divorce lawsuit with the victim.

On May 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim, who was in his house after surgery with the Maamambam, dumpeded the above D with one another on the ground that the victim dumpeded dumpeded dumped hump water, which is good for the treatment of the Maambambam; (b) was investigated by the police station as the co-principal of the violence in existence; (c) completed the marriage relationship with the above victim, and (d) had the victim dumped dumped into the marriage with the above victim; and (c) was aware that he was entrusted with the issuance of a certificate of the seal imprint by the means of the said fighting; and (d) was aware of the ownership of the Defendant under his name, Namyangyang-si, Namyang-si, 101-102, which was registered under his name, transferred the Defendant’s ownership to the Fur

around 15:00 on May 6, 2013, the Defendant stated “C”, “G”, and “G” in the name of the delegating address column in the letter of proxy for the certificate of seal imprint on the letter of proxy for the certificate of seal imprint at the Dong-to-Eup office located in Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, 117-1, Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, Yan-do, and marked the seal of the said victim who moved back from the name of the delegating, on the letter of proxy for the certificate of seal imprint, and affixed the seal of the said victim.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant is a certificate of seal impression in the name of the victim as a private document.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고정255

-인천지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고정2023

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.22 2013고단5541

-서울남부지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단2957

-의정부지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단5273