Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a Cbee or a car.

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on April 17, 2014, and led to the intersection of the lower-speed distance in front of 15 roads (Haak-dong) in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, to drive at an irregular speed depending on the two-lanes in the upstream direction from the upstream direction.

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was due to the negligence of disregarding and proceeding the stop signal of the Defendant’s proceeding direction, and received the front left part of the victim D(55 years old) driving E-si driving, which took place in the direction of the e-si in the direction of the e-si in the direction of the e-mail in the direction of the e-mail.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim D, such as the escape from a warning sign No. 6-7, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and injury to the victim F (18 years of age) who is the passenger of the said taxi, such as scam and tensions that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of G, D, and F;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, photographs of the scene of accidents, and photographs of damaged taxi;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant's negligence in the crime of this case and the degree of injury to the victim D is significant, but the defendant's mistake is recognized, the circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the defendant.