1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date when this judgment has become final and conclusive;

3...

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 30, 2012, the Defendant of the first accident: (a) while under the influence of alcohol of 01:04% of alcohol content, the Defendant driven an occupational cyp mpha car with a 0.114% alcohol content; and (b) while proceeding the roads in front of the 155-1 mountain-ri small-scale, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government pursuant to the direction of the new village in the direction of the red-surg, the Defendant was at night, and the snow surged was at night; and (c) there was a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed; (d) accordingly, the Defendant was obliged to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle with the duty of care to observe the center line and drive the steering system in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to the collision of the left part of the driving car of the victim D(29 years old) driving, which was parked in the opposite lane due to the negligence of driving the center line, with the front part of the driving car of the Defendant.

At the same time, the Defendant got injured by the victim D and the victim F (n, 30 years of age) who was on board the above test with the above test car due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant did not stop the above test car to order approximately KRW 490,766 to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though it was damaged by the repair cost.

2. The second accident Defendant continued to drive the said vehicle immediately after the first accident as set forth in the above 1. paragraph, and continued to drive the said vehicle in front of the 409 road in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and proceeding in the direction of the Gohap Station in the direction of the Gohap Station. In other words, the part of the victim G (the age of 41) driver’s H business taxi in the front direction of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, which was in progress in the opposite opposite lane due to the negligence of breaking the central line, was shocked into the front part of the vehicle.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, treats the victim I (35 years of age) and J (31 years of age) for two weeks each, who was on board the victim G, and the passenger who was on board the said taxi.