1. The Defendants, each of the Plaintiff, remove the buildings indicated in the attached Table No. 532 square meters on the ground of the HJ 532 square meters in Innju City, and the said site is the same.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The net I registered the building ledger as the owner on August 20, 1990, on the building ledger concerning the building indicated in the list on the ground (hereinafter “instant building”) on the land of H 532 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On January 18, 1994, J, the Plaintiff’s mother, completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant building site in accordance with Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate Ownership Transfer (No. 4502), and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 1, 2004 on the instant building site due to a donation made on June 28, 2004.

C. The deceased, while residing in the instant building, concluded a lease agreement with J on the instant site to pay the end of the Congo each year in rent, and paid the above rent. The deceased on December 19, 2008.

From 2010 to 2010, the Plaintiff sent to the deceased I and the present residents a certificate of content that the lease contract is terminated on the ground of the non-payment of rent for four years (hereinafter “instant content certificate”).

E. The Defendants are siblings of the deceased I’s property heir.

[Grounds for Recognition: Confession or confessions, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole video and oral pleadings]

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, since the content certification of this case containing an expression of intent to terminate the lease contract on the grounds of non-payment of rent and the service of a copy of the complaint of this case between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, who are the heir of the deceased I, are legally rescinded, the Defendants are obligated to remove the building of this case to each Plaintiff and deliver the site of this case.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants can be accepted in entirety, and it is so decided as per Disposition.