Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2016, around 17:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim was able to talk with the victim E (57 tax) and the head of the household in the process of dialogueing with the victim E (57 tax) on August 10, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statements of E;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the accused (including the cross-examination of the victim among the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the second time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's spouse, F and F's spouse G with the victim's spouse, and the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's d

2. Determination

A. In a case where the statement of a witness, including the victim, is mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission unless there exist any separate and reliable data to deem the credibility objectively acceptable from an objective perspective (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2004Do362, Apr. 15, 2005; 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). (b) The victim, in this court and in an investigative agency, “in the course of a conversation with the defendant, the defendant was forced to take the floths and arms while the defendant s/he talked with the victim,” and “the victim’s voice would no longer be said to have been expressed in the way that the victim raised his voice.”

As the defendant intends to take place in the workplace, I will see his son.