A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

One (No. 1) and a mobile phone (LG-SU660) that has been seized mobile phones HV-E30K).

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 4478"

1. On August 7, 2014, at around 22:55, the Defendant, who attempted to damage property, was under the influence of alcohol on a road located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, D, and tried to damage the vehicle by walking the Franchise owned by the Victim E with a right to the left-hand edge of the TGG car. However, the Defendant attempted to do so with the wind coming from the wind.

2. On the same day as Paragraph 1, at around 23:15 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested in a flagrant offender on the ground of Paragraph 1 at the H police box located in Suwon-si G, Suwon-si, and at the time when the police box belonging to the above police box was taken one time as the hand floor of the police box he was arrested.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the transfer of flagrant offenders.

"2014 Highest 6570"

1. On August 24, 2014, the Defendant stolen the gap in the victim C’s residence located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, J and 504, and the victim C, which was the victim’s possession, one unit of the gallonular phone 1 (No. 1), one unit of LG mobile phone 1 (No. 2) and one unit of the charging machine, which was the victim’s possession.

2. On August 30, 2014, around 07:36, the Defendant discovered the victim M at a 9-story soup room located in K in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and stolen the victim’s cell phone 1, who was the victim’s possession by putting the victim at his/her head.

On December 4, 2014, at around 15:50, Defendant 15:50 of 2014, the victim P exceeded one punishment for the Nos. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. store located in N in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the victim P exceeded one punishment for the Nos. S. S. S. S. S. store, and the other victim’s market price was at least 4.20,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 4478"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault against the defendant in the statement of each witness examination protocol against the witness E and I. However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant will be the Gyeong in the same manner as the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in the judgment of the defendant.