logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.19 2020나2003473
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the parts concerning plaintiffs D and F are modified as follows:

Defendant N and J Association are joint.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications:

[Revision] From the 18th of the first instance judgment to the 19th of the 18th of the 19th of the 18th of the 19th of the 19th of the 19th instance judgment

In light of the following circumstances, the Defendants’ damages liability amount of the instant licensed real estate agent should be limited to 40% in the case of Defendant N and P, and 50% in the case of the remainder, based on the following: (a) Defendant N and P, the co-Defendant M of the first instance court, and Defendant L, the manager of the instant building, who made an oral hearing of the current status of the lease deposit from N and P, and made efforts to a certain extent, such as the delivery to the lessee by entering them in the confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage; and (b) other circumstances indicated in the argument of the instant case:

The Defendants’ damages liability amount of the Defendants’ negligence ratio of the U.S. collection deposit (i.e., unrefilled deposit x Defendant’s negligence ratio) 4D D 16 million won KRW 40% KRW 6.4 million KRW 6.4 million KRW 40% KRW 60% KRW 6.4 million by Defendant N’s judgment of the first instance court, i.e., Defendant N through 12, as follows.

Defendant N and the Association jointly conflict with Plaintiff D about KRW 6.4 million from October 17, 2018, following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint against Defendant N, and the Defendant Association, from February 22, 2018 to February 19, 2020, where it is deemed reasonable for Defendant N and the Association to dispute about the existence and scope of each of its obligations from February 22, 2018, as of August 19, 2020, 5% per annum under the Civil Act and 0% from the following day to the date of full payment.

arrow