1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached Form 1 among the buildings listed in Annex 2 List 1 on the land listed in Annex 1 List 1;

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers) and the result of appraiser C’s measurement and appraisal by this court, part of each of the buildings indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 2 attached hereto owned by the plaintiff is invaded with the same content as the order No. 1 (i.e., the part of the building indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 in the separate sheet No. 1 in order to connect each point of 14, 4, 16, 15, 14 with the land surface indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 in the separate sheet No. 2 list No. 5 square meters connected each point of 20, 9, 10, 20 square meters, the part of the building in the separate sheet No. 2 list No. 3 is connected to the plaintiff, and part of the building in the separate sheet No. 4, 5, 16, 4 of the building in the separate sheet No. 2 list No. 3 attached hereto, and part of the building in the separate sheet No. 13 attached sheet No. 72.

2. As to this, inasmuch as the Defendant did not have any problem for the Plaintiff to exercise the right to new construction works on each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 owned by him, even if there is no part of the instant intrusion, it is inevitable for five tenants to operate the business and to remove all buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which are attached hereto, to recover the part of the instant intrusion, which is merely 21 square meters, to lead to a living. The instant claim is during the course of trade consultation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant regarding the part of the instant intrusion.