logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.11.16 2016가합71976
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 22, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) filed a building report and repair; and (b) filed a building report with the Mayor of the Pakistan; and (c) Category B 1,193 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) which is a planned management area.

2) On the ground of 1.1 square meters in building area and 20.7 square meters in total floor area (11.1 square meters in a 1st floor, 2nd 9.6 square meters in a 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3

) A construction report stating the new construction of dangerous storage and disposal facilities (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction report”).

(2) While carrying out the instant building report, the Plaintiff submitted the construction outline, main sectional map, site spons, and the building site 17 oil storage tank (hereinafter “instant oil storage tank”) with the moving line, each of the drawings on the instant ground buildings [the entrance map, entrance map, roof map, ground surface map, ground floor plan, ground floor plan, ground surface plan], and the building site construction plan of 122 meters in total as well as the building site construction plan of the instant ground building in the form of electromagnetic wave.

3) On March 13, 2013, the project owner having jurisdiction over the instant building report requires the Plaintiff to supplement the construction report of this case, “the submission of the allocation level and structural drawing of the structure”, “the accurate handling product and type of dangerous substance disposal facilities, the facility standards (storage facilities, transportation prevention, etc.),” etc. (Article 118 of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act and Article 41 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (hereinafter “the instant supplementary report”).

On March 14, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted a retaining wall planning map, a site crossing/sloping map, a retaining wall cross-section, and a general drawing. 4) On April 1, 2013, the so-called “acceptance of the instant building report” was accepted on April 1, 2013 in the so-called “instant building report.”

arrow