1. Defendant B’s KRW 28,872,652 as well as 5% per annum from December 25, 2013 to August 27, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B’s design drawing No. 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s land of this case with the 142 square meters in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-do (hereinafter “instant land”).

2) On the ground, the building built of reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter “instant building”) is a building built of reinforced concrete structure.

A) A plan to newly construct the instant building, and around January 2013, Defendant B entered into a design service agreement with Defendant B, an architect (in the absence of any dispute) on the instant building (hereinafter “instant design agreement”) in accordance with the design service agreement with the Plaintiff, Defendant B drafted a design map (hereinafter “instant drawing”) composed of ① plot plan (a drawing representing the location relationship between the building and the site), ② a floor plan of the first and second floors of the instant building (a drawing representing the horizontal structure of the building, on which the building was horizontally cut from a height of about 1.2m), ③ an entrance map (a drawing representing its exterior as the vertical diameter of the building), ④ a cross-section (a drawing representing its vertical length as a vertical length), and a drawing indicating its cross-section (a drawing expressing the shape in which the front or bottom of the object was cut off) in order to indicate the internal structure (hereinafter “instant drawing”).

(B) No. 2-3 to 7). (b)

In March 2013, the Plaintiff delegated Defendant B with the comprehensive authority over administrative procedures, such as the building report, etc. of the instant building (Evidence 1) and Defendant B reported the construction of the instant building on behalf of the Plaintiff on March 12, 2013.

On March 13, 2013, Defendant Bodo-gun prepared a review report stating the purport that the instant building conforms to all of the requirements, such as “conformity with sunshine distance, etc. by sunshine rights,” etc., and notified the Plaintiff on March 14, 2013 that he accepted a report on the construction of the instant building pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Building Act.

(B) The Defendant B, on his behalf of the Plaintiff on March 14, 2013, is himself to the Defendant Hado-gun. (1) 1, 2, 2-Na 3-1, 3-2, 4)