logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.02.14 2014가단33569
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 41,561,341 as well as 5% per annum from February 18, 2014 to February 14, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 26, 2013, the Defendant determined the C Corporation located B (hereinafter “instant Corporation”) in Jeju-si from the Jeju Fish Farming Fisheries Cooperatives (hereinafter “ Jeju Fish Farming Cooperatives”) as the price for KRW 2,49,90,000 (including value-added tax) and received a contract therefor.

B. On October 9, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant under which the Plaintiff set the price of KRW 130,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) relating to the instant construction project and set the said price at KRW 130,00,00 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

3. 1) The purpose of the contract is to complete the manufacture, supply and installation (including trial operation) of machinery by December 10, 2013 (including installation work) 1) the equipment, personnel expenses, painting work (including raw materials: Defendant) the equipment, 4) the equipment, personnel expenses, and painting work. The raw materials are provided by Party A (Defendant: Defendant). The raw materials and expends are to be borne by Party B (Plaintiff) and 14. The payment period and the installation (including the installation work) of machinery until December 10, 2013. (Provided, That where the trial run is delayed due to the circumstances of Party A (Defendant), the compensation for delay shall be 1/500 per day after consultation).

3) B (the plaintiff side must supply) in compliance with the date of request for acceptance by the defendant on the condition that the construction is being in progress.

C. According to the instant contract, the Plaintiff’s specific construction items are Hober and the opening and closing painting, waste-based waste-based waste-generating consortium, waste-based waste-based waste-generating consortium, waste-based waste-based waste-generating consortium, waste-based waste-generating consortium, waste-generating consortium, waste-based waste-generating consortium, waste-generating waste-based waste-generating, waste-based waste-generating consultation, riton-based waste-generating consultation, waste-generating tank, product-generating consultation, product-generating consultation, waste-based waste-generating, waste-based waste-generating, liquid-storage, liquid-storage, and waste-generating tanks. D.

From October 18, 2013 to February 3, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) three times from the Defendant during the period from October 18, 2013 to February 3, 2014; (b) 99,100.

arrow