1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that supplies water supply systems, water supply systems, construction materials, etc., and the Defendant (the Defendant’s trade name was a newly preferred development company around 2013, but the trade name was changed to a limited liability company on February 9, 2015, a limited liability company, and a MS construction company on September 5, 2016) was a company that conducts an engineering work, construction work, etc., and A was a field agent from March 15, 2013 to May 7, 2015.

B. The Defendant was awarded a contract for “B”, “C”, and “D” (hereinafter “each of the instant construction works”) and subcontracted part of them to E and F Co., Ltd.

C. From March 2013 to April 2015, the Plaintiff: (i) KRW 13,832,280 in total at each of the instant construction sites (hereinafter “B business”); (ii) KRW 3,063,940 in April 2014; (iii) KRW 2,398,10 in September 2014; (iv) KRW 1,876,490 in September 2014; and (v) KRW 1,448,70 in September 2014; and (iv) KRW 29,040 in December 2015 (former) KRW 2,605, KRW 200 in goods supply; and (v) KRW 39,04 in 20 in 205, KRW 39,940 in 20 in 205; and (v) KRW 405,940 in 20 in 2014; and (v) KRW 945,205,205.

As above, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice stating that the goods equivalent to KRW 13,832,280 were supplied to the Defendant, and the Defendant filed a value-added tax return accordingly.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's 1 through 3, 5 through 8, Eul's 2 through 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. As to the construction work for which the Defendant received a direct contract without giving a subcontract among each of the instant construction works alleged by the Plaintiff, the Defendant supplied the goods by concluding a contract for the supply of construction materials with A who represented the Defendant.