logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.03.26 2014가단739
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1 million to Plaintiff A, and for this, KRW 5% per annum from January 11, 2014 to March 26, 2015; and (b).

Reasons

Facts of recognition

Before the injection, Plaintiff A visited Tol University Seoul Hospital on September 5, 2006, which was five months prior to the instant injection, to receive medical treatment for each part of the right eye. On September 5, 2006, Plaintiff A’s test value of the visual eye at the right eye was 0.06 (0.1 when wearing an erogate) and there was symptoms, such as “the erogate-centered erode closure of an erogate,” etc.

Since then, the plaintiff A maintained 0.1 the test value of the vision of wearing a scam, and received medical treatment from the above hospital, and visited the defendant's hospital on January 30, 2007.

Meanwhile, the Defendant: (a) performed 10 times from August 31, 2006, the Plaintiff’s treatment of the Plaintiff A, before receiving medical treatment at the Tol University Seoul Mother Hospital; and (b) at the time, the Plaintiff’s visual pressure was within the normal range.

When the Plaintiff A visited the Defendant’s hospital again on January 30, 2007, the Plaintiff’s right vision was in a state where he could recognize only the movement of his hand in the front of the safe flood road. The Plaintiff’s right vision was in a state where the Plaintiff A was able to see the movement of his hand in the front of the safe flood road. In addition to the various maritis, it was in a state where it was cut off.

In order to treat the above symptoms, the Defendant saw the Plaintiff’s right eye, the stroke, the terodroid, the terodroid, and the terodrhy terodrhythy in the process (hereinafter “the instant injection”). In the process, the Defendant saw the Plaintiff’s right eye center of the right eye of the Plaintiff A.

The defendant did not have conducted a pressure test on the plaintiff A's right eye before the above injection procedure, and did not explain to the plaintiff on the side effects of the injection of this case.

As the Defendant was at the right end of Plaintiff A, the Defendant conducted hospital treatment for Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff was discharged on February 5, 2007 after completing the hospital treatment.

From February 7, 2007, the plaintiff A lost visual vision from the point of view on the right side, and the plaintiff A was provided with the care and treatment at the Tol University Seoul Mother Hospital on February 7, 2007, and is a doctor in charge.

arrow