logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.09.27 2017고합54
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The case number was arranged in the order of time, not in the order of case number, and part of the facts charged was revised according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court.

[The background of the instant case] Between the E-Packing horse operated by D on October 20, 2016 at the Nam-gu Seoul City around 00:03, the Defendant filed a complaint between the mother of the victim G (n, 62 years of age) and the H packing horse operated by the victim F (n, f3 years of age) (i.e., the mother of the victim) on October 20, 2016, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim F and G, stating that H packing horse would be able to deprive the Defendant of the customers of the packaging horse, and that he was issued a summary order with the victim F and G (hereinafter “the instant insult crime”). On October 21, 2016, the victim F was issued a fine of KRW 10,000,000,000 and KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000).

[Criminal Facts] On December 5, 2016, the Defendant 2017, 58, around 22:18, 2016, at the above E-Packing end, for the purpose of retaliationing the victim F with respect to the promotion of religion for the above reasons, the Defendant is going to the victim F, who works at the immediately next H packing end on the top, without face from the ceiling floor.

I will be free to know only.

Twelve 25th day of December, 198. It shows what kind of internalism is.

I would like to offer a good faith.

“Along with the perception that the victim F would have any danger and injury to the life, body, or property of the victim F, such as “.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim F with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation, such as complaint and accusation, statements, and submission of data in connection with the investigation or trial of his criminal case.

" 2017 Gohap 54"

1. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant is the victim F, in relation to the Defendant’s desire to take advantage of the H packing horse, as stated in the facts constituting the crime of 2017 Gohap 58, around December 23, 2016.

arrow