1. The Defendant: 20,000,000 won to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); 5,000,000 won to the Selection B; 1,500,000 won to the Selection C, D, and E, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On May 28, 2010, at around 15:30, the F used a G (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) to drive a road located at the lower gate of the road, while driving the road on the right side of the road (hereinafter “instant accident”) and driving the Plaintiff, who was crossing the road on the right side from the left side of the road (hereinafter “instant accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s failure to perform medical treatment of more than 10 weeks on the right side of the road, on the one hand, and on the other, on the other, on the other.

The Defendant is the insurer of the instant vehicle.

The designated parties B are the husband of the plaintiff, and the designated parties C, D, and E are children of the plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] The defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff and the designated parties due to the accident in this case, according to the fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1-4 evidence, and the purport of the whole argument.

B. The Defendant asserts that the instant accident was caused by the Plaintiff’s total negligence, on the ground that the instant vehicle was crossing the road at the time when the instant vehicle arrives almost at the scene of the accident without examining the driver’s right and the right of the horse on the string in the direction of driving the vehicle.

① In the event of the instant accident, the speed of the road is 50km per hour, the time of the occurrence of the accident is 15:30 square meters, and the location at which the accident occurred was the straight line of the road without any visual interference.

② At the point of accident, the string of the instant vehicle driving direction was stopped, and the location of the accident was immediately adjacent to the vehicle.

③ The Plaintiff was shocked at the center of the front driver of the instant vehicle.

④ The above road has a skiing mark due to the sudden operation of the instant vehicle, and the speed immediately before the accident of the instant vehicle, which is presumed by the said skiing mark and the location of the Plaintiff fallen, is about 71 km as soon as possible.

(A) Evidence Nos. 5, A 19, and the purport of the whole pleadings.