logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.19 2013가합549794
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B Co., Ltd. is dismissed.

2. Defendant well-being Corporation

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties and the present status of the apartment of this case 1) The plaintiff is a A apartment (3 Dong Dong 220 households, hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case") located on the ground D in Young-si Suwon District D

(2) For the management of the apartment of this case, the apartment building of this case is constructed and sold as an executor, and Defendant B is a contractor for the construction of the apartment building of this case on July 29, 2009 and a contractor for the construction of the new apartment of this case is the company that guaranteed Defendant B’s obligation to repair the defects of the apartment of this case.

B. (1) Defendant B obtained approval for the use of the instant apartment on December 28, 201, and on the same day, Defendant B as the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union entered into a warranty contract for the instant apartment as set out in the table 1 through 6 with respect to the instant apartment between the Defendant Union and the Plaintiff on the same day.

A) A contract is concluded, and the Defendant Cooperative issued a warranty bond from the Defendant Cooperative, and deposited it with the Mayor, who is the right to use the bond. According to the warranty warranty period from December 28, 201 to December 27, 2012, 116,360,010 to December 28, 2011, 290,90,025 3, 2025 3, 201, 201, 205, or 232,720,720, 0204, 205, 201, 205, 205, 205, 201, 205, 205, 201, 205, 205, 201, 25, 2015, 201, 25, 2014, 25, 2015, 2015.

arrow